DonHoraldo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

"Life is absolute; something is either alive or not alive."life is a set of chemical processes that follow a list of characteristics. so if a set of processes has most but not all could it be considered life? an example of this would be the RNA world hypothesis."Spontaneous means a self-generated event"but life came from a series of steps none where "self-generated". every step built on the previous.

0megaPhr0g (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Spontaneous means a self-generated event, typically requiring no outside influence or help. Life is absolute; something is either alive or not alive. At some point in the supposed evolutionary timeline of all life on earth, life started. If God is not needed, than it is spontaneous.

smoothgoomer (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

lol "The chances of life spontaneously appearing on this planet are mathematically impossible." Yes, that's true.But when we talk about life appearing, we in no way mean to imply that it sponTANEOUSLY appeared... it gradually evolved over time, in a process of cause and effect. Much like gravity is the cause of the earths rotation around the sun, chemical interaction caused life to appear. No god needed.

DonHoraldo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

the odds of life in the universe are 1. the odds of multiple civilizations of intelligent life approaches 1. the odds of a intelligent civilization obtaining space travel long enough ago for them to travel to each other approaches 0.

DonHoraldo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

or it could be the personification of nature.

0megaPhr0g (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

When compared to what? Something you have never seen? And God is mythology? Wow, it never ceases to amaze me how someone can refuse to even entertain the possibility of an intelligent creator because they have never seen Him, yet other "intelligent life forms somewhere out there" is totally believable. Life spontaneously arising on this planet is mathematically impossible, so why not just go ahead and believe that it happened many multiple times?

GodisMythology (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

It is absurd to think we are the only advanced intelligence in the universe. In fact, by comparison we are as evolved as amoeba. There is no conclusive evidence we have been visited by such advanced civilizations but I am open to the possibilities. It would explain these silly god myths for sure.

DonHoraldo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

"There is NONE as i have clearly proven consistently."and yet that has no thing to do with disproving it. support is just that. but like I've said before science is always looking for the black dove.

alien8ted (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

It really gets to you that no-one who visits this video believes in your stupid god-myth, doesn't it, eejit? Just you, sojoytroll and jerrod support the moronic notion that an invisible superman runs the cosmos, and only brain-dead superstitious ignorant imbeciles like you actually fall for it. You can try an twist everyone's comments, but it all just goes to show you have a totally ridiculously distorted view of reality, and have to make up lies to maintain your crumbling faith.

SASwarzone1 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

"funny how it is being supported by new discoveries every year then."There is NONE as i have clearly proven consistently.