9/11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #2 of 4
 |
||
9-11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Conspiracy - Crash Course #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Conspiracy - Crash Course #3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Conspiracy - Crash Course #4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Does a Demolition Look Like?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Question 9-11 #1: Max Cleland: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 1-The building of the World Trade Center-President George Bush claims to have seen the plane crash into the South Tower at the time in which in happened--even though the first crash wasn't televised at the time-Les Robertson (WTC structural engineer) and Frank A. DeMartini (Manager, WTC Construction & Project Management) tell how they built the WTC with plane crashes in mind-Jonathan R. Barnett, Ph.D. (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) says that he had never seen a protected steel structure collapse in a fire-James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Deluth) and Jeff King (MIT engineer/research scientist) give their synopsis of the WTC collapses. Also:-The melting point of steel-Properties of the WTC steel-Burning temperatures of kerosene-based jet fuel-Temperatures in the WTC on 9-11-Black smoke as an indicator of an oxygen-poor fire.Part 2-Eyewitnesses recall multiple "explosions"-NBC's Pat Dawson relates that FDNY's Fire Safety Chief, Albert Turi thought that there were "devices planted in the building"-William Rodriguez (20+ year WTC employee, and last survivor to exit the WTC) gives his statement of multiple explosions from "lower floors"-James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Deluth) and Jeff King (MIT engineer/research scientist) tell why the WTC collapses had to be the result of demolitions-Morgan Reynolds (ex-labor department economist during President George W. Bush's first term) tells why he thinks that the WTC was the result of a controlled demolition-Larry Silverstein recalls the orders to "Pull" WTC #7 on a PBS documentaryAlso:-Information about CDI, (Controlled Demolition, Inc.) the company which was hired to remove the remains of the WTC-Actual demolition footage-WTC explosions recorded by Columbia University's seismographs-Evidence of squibs-Only known footage of the first plane hitting the first tower-Pre-positioned explosives would have been necessary-Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport.Part 3-CNN reporter discusses the possibility of explosives at the base of the towers-Dallas Landmark Tower Demolition-Scott Forbes (IT Specialist - Fiduciary Trust employee, WTC) and William Rodriguez (20+ year WTC employee, and last survivor to exit the WTC) recall strange happenings at the WTC during the weeks prior to 9-11-William Rodriguez shares what he heard on the 34th floor on 9-11-Brian Clark (Volunteer Fire Marshall) and Stanley Praimnath (survivor - 81st floor) share their experiences after exiting the south tower.Also:-Evidence of blast damage in the WTC lobby-Power downs and evacuation drills at the WTC prior to 9-11Part 4-BBC news update that WTC #7 has collapsed (this footage aired BEFORE #7 actually collapsed)-Larry Silverstein (WTC leaseholder) recalls the orders to "Pull" WTC #7 on a PBS documentary-Rudy Giuliani reveals that he had been given advanced warning that "the World Trade Center was going to collapse"-video of a woman in uniform announcing to the crowd that the tower was "about to collapse"-video of the ground shaking just seconds before the collapse-Danny Jowenko (Dutch professional demolitions expert) reaffirms his statement that he believes that the WTC had to have been brought down by demolition-Thermal hot spots of ground zero--taken on September 16th and September 23rd, 2001-Evidence of thermite having been used to bring down the WTC-footage of the red-hot rubbel at Ground Zero -Photos of steel buildings which have burned (and never collapsed), including: Caracas, Venezeula: A 56-story office tower burned for 17 hours Taiwan: Building burned for an hour and a half Los Angeles: 62-story Interstate Bank Building burned for four hours Madrid, Spain: 32-story Windsor Building burned for two days Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The 38-story One Meridian Plaza building burned for 18 hours.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am
Autor: vicki68
Duración: 08:32
Puntuación: 4.41
Reproducciones: 245890
Etiquetas: 11 9-11 9/11 911 center conspiracy demolition inside job o'donnell rosie september towers trade twin world wtc
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios
|
sexphilfan1 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
LOOK PEOPLEy whod our presadent want people to die y whod thay plan this y are u people doing this if it was planed then y hit that thay whod have planed to in a more inproint place
oklsuxlonghorns (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
LOOK PEOPLE...it's already come out that Building Seven was "pulled" because the fire department said it wasn't going to be able to control "the fire"if the building was, in fact, "pulled", then that would've required explosives to have already been in place weeks before 9/11...so we know this much is true...Now, which one of you out there is prepared to argue that Building 7 was a controlled demolition while the Twin Towers collapsed due to jet-fueled fires melting steel?? hmm?
halfdog26 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Why are the only people who claim the steel "melted" are the conspiracy theorists themselves. The NIST, FEMA, UL, and others only say the fires "WEAKENED" the steel NOT melted it. Also what about all the "workers" who would have planted the explosives, none of them have come forward. A conspiracy of this size would involve hundreds if not thousands of people. It only takes one whistle blower right? Let me geuss they were all taken to area 51 and killed by the U.S. military.
Miguelito2010 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The 911 issue was clearly an inside job. A classic and very professional demolition work. Plane crushes had noting to do with building colapse. The jetfuel was totally consumed in less than 10 minutes. Just take a closer look onto the videoa again.
hellobaby2010 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
ok the towers were built to with hold a the biggest plan back then but the plans over years got bigger they started to build a fire prof wall or what ever but both plan hit above where they had not got to so the steel weakened and when it did the floors above it and the remains got two heavy thats how it came down no fucking bombs people that believe this shit needs to grow the fuck up
stovall1 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
It was all caused by a micro-nuke in the second floor lounge toilet. Die shills!
rfalfonse (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
You know how the towers came down. That's more than NIST can say.Here's your source for the NIST letter to the family members911 proof . com / NIST . pdf What evidence do you have that the fires burned at 1000C?What evidence do you have that the fires burned long enough at 1000C to weaken the steel enough to cause a global collapse.The steel wasn't tested for office fires. It was tested for temperatures relative to itsload bearing capacity.The WTC was built for jet impact consequences.
rfalfonse (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
NIST says nothing about a conventional office fire. Source the NIST report section that mentions office fires.You haven't given me almost direct quotes. Source them.I've sourced my info. You have yet to do so.I'll source one more time my statement that NIST admits the fires didn't damage the steel:(NIST NCSTAR p. 1-3 xli, 101)Oh and btw, I 'm still waiting for you to prove terrorists did 9/11...
jusso11 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I'm not sure what I know that NIST doesn't..Show me NIST saying this, show me the admission, show me the letter to a victim family...It has already been stated that heat begins to weaken steel at 450C.Yes,it can easily withstand up to 600C and more,but it has been proven the fires burned at over 1000C,much higher than the conventional office fires they were tested for.Yes they were tested withstand a plane, but not subsequent circumstances from THESE planes.ESB comparison is irrelevant.
rfalfonse (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The jet fuel is a red herring. It doesn't burn hot enough to weaken structural steel critically. The WTC fires didn't burn long or hot enough to even be considered a realistic casue of the collapse. Shyam Sunder, NISTs lead scientist, admitted that the jet fuel burned out in less than ten minutes.You're entering into new territory here btw. NIST admitted in a letter to victim family members that it can't fully explain the collapse of the WTC.What do you know that NIST doesn't?
|
Buscar Videos
Videos Relacionados:
 |