gbaby73 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

edison powah

rnasuhar (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

haha edision chen deserved this he is a f***ing sex maniac.he has one thing on his mind just to bed with those girls,and those photos are like a sense of accomplishment and a trophy to him.He should feel guilty before he took those photos.If edison do not ask for any photo to be taken,personally i think the girls would not take any photo and there will be no photo leaked.This is all his FAULT.

lilyisme360 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

if you think what he did was wrongthen i guess you'r against porn too?even though porn is like legal..i don't see why he;s to blame

Grabandgo (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Winar! -> Optimisticgrl!

optimisticgrl (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

sigh. the public support has nothing to do with this. saying that he manipulated those women would be speculating. i'm tired of this argument. all you're really doing is using offensive words against me and those words don't prove your point. i understand that the women were negatively affected by what happened. but that's not the point. i am merely saying that edison owes the public nothing. calling me a "dumb hoe" would be slandering and you can get sued for that.

Yaponchik777 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

shut the fuck up you stupid bitch trying to defend a sexual predator. you know damn well what i meant, he has lost the publics support and nobody gives a damn about how much of a victim he alleges to be after he manipulated those poor women. perhaps you want to spread your legs for the camera too? dumb hoe

optimisticgrl (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

i'm sorry, but this is just an immature argument that will not work in court. people don't waive their right to be a victim. being a victim isn't a right. he's either a victim or he's not. if you're referring to the rights OF a victim, it would still not matter. Again, he has done nothing illegal to give up his rights in the first place.

Yaponchik777 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

he waved all his rights to be a victim when he carried out his sadistic and malicious voyeuristic acts with these girls, who were clearly exposed, vulnerable, and mentally coerced to do these things on camera

optimisticgrl (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

ok first off, he did not rape or violate those girls. he had their consent to have sex with them and take their pictures. for the victim part, i was referring to the fact that his privacy got violated and invaded through illegal means. under the court of law, he is a victim in the sense that his privacy right was violated. i was making a comparison between edison and the public, and the fact is, he owes the public nothing. as for the girls, i didn't even mention them in my previous comment...

Yaponchik777 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

how the fuck is he a victim you moron he took advantage of all those girls and now his career is ruined ahahaha, he fucking got what he deserved so shut the fuck up carebear