Eddie Tabash: Speech and Q&A at AAI 07
 |
||
http://www.rationalresponders.... Tabash's talk at AAI 07 titled "The Present Threat of the Religious Right to Our Modern Freedoms."Margaret Downey at: http://www.Margaretdowney.comV... the AAI website at: http://atheistalliance.orgSee more videos like this at http://richarddawkins.netand http://video.rationalresponder... by The Richard Dawkins FoundationCamera:Wayne MarsalaJosh TimonenEdited byJosh Timonen
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am
Autor: RationalResponse
Duración: 43:57
Puntuación: 4.84
Reproducciones: 10738
Etiquetas: Church Court Dawkins Eddie Edward Judges Religion Richard Separation State Supreme Tabash
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios
|
keithlogan365 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I'm an atheist, but I find alot of his comments off the mark. Simply because some religious conservatives desire some policy is no guarantee that they could get a majority and get the policy through the legislature - birth control, for instance, is probably far too popular to ever be outlawed again in any state. Likewise, many of the more extreme religious positions would find little popular support and have no chance of being put into law.
capitalist88 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Excellent point on 24:21 GBanville. I grimaced at that point too.
Splatador (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
As an American, I find it VERY scary.
opinionhead444 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Weirdly, why aren't more religionists pushing for Tabash's agenda? Logically speaking, the death toll for dissenting against theocracy would be higher for the believers that disagree since they outnumber all the freethinkers in the country.
scottious (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Chilling. He's a little dry, but spot on.
falconiqx (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Okay... so it wasn't a bad speech... but dear god was it dry... I mean drink some water and loosen up a little. maybe have some tequila instead of water.Yeah it was serious and I agreed with 97% of it, but a smile now an then wouldn't hurt.
johnclavis (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I'm afraid that Mr. Tabash drops the ball at 30:00 or so, with talk of "Rabbi Lieberman"... his 100% NARAL rating is worthless. Joe was part of the Gang of 14 who prevented any filibuster of Alito in the name of bipartisanship; then voted against holding up the nomination; *then*, technically, voted not to confirm him, after it was clear his vote wouldn't count.Joe's legislative activity allowed these anti-abortion judges onto the Supreme Court. He's a fink.
johnclavis (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I was dubious at first -- the guy doesn't have a lot of charisma -- but by the end, I thought it was a stirring speech. Bravo! Thanks for posting this!The picture he paints truly is scary. The top 1% have brainwashed the masses into thinking that "college=liberal indoctrination" and "education-prayer=evil" and "you only need to read one book", so now the voters are too ignorant to see through charlatans like Romney and Rudy and Huck.
tothboy01 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Interesting video. Thanks for posting!
GBanville (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I love that he mentions Goldwater.Shocking point at just past 7 minutes.Note: The doctrines of the justices he's talking about at 20 mins aren't just religios, they are specifically controlling, tribalistic, nationalistic. In other words, they bear the distinct tang of neoconservatism.24:21 No. If he wants to hew strictly to the constitution then charity is not a legitimate function of govt.36:22 Voting for hypocrites is a necessity.And overall impression: He's a bit of a fear-monger, no?
|
Buscar Videos
Videos Relacionados:
Gasolina barata Audi 3 combustibles Ferrari ahorrar Gasolina auto ahorro de combustibles filtros gasolina Lamborghini
 |